클리닉소개

THE SEOUL YOUTH CLINIC

연구 및 치료성과

Differences between bipolar I and bipolar II disorders in clinical features, comorbidity, and family history.
Journal
Journal of Affective Disorders
Vol
131: 1-3
Page
59-67
Author
Ji Hyun Baek, Dong Yeon Park, Jungmi Choi, Ji Sun Kim, Ji Sun Choi, Kyooseob Ha, Jun Soo Kwon, Dongsoo Lee, Kyung Sue Hong
Year
2011

Abstract

Background

The present study was designed to investigate whether bipolar II disorder (BP-II) has different characteristics from bipolar I disorder (BP-I), not only in manic severity but also in clinical features, prior course, comorbidity, and family history, sufficiently enough to provide its nosological separation from BP-I.

Methods

Comprehensive clinical evaluation was performed based on information available from ordinary clinical settings. Seventy-one BP-I and 34 BP-II patients were assessed using the Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies, Korean version. Psychiatric assessment for first-degree relatives (n = 374) of the probands was performed using the modified version of the Family History-Research Diagnostic Criteria.

Results

The frequency of depressive episodes was higher in BP-II (p = 0.009) compared to BP-I. Further, seasonality (p = 0.035) and rapid-cycling course (p = 0.062) were more common in BP-II. Regarding manic expression, ‘elated mood’ was predominant in BP-II whereas ‘elated mood’ and ‘irritable mood’ were equally prevalent in BP-I. With regard to depressive symptoms, psychomotor agitation, guilty feeling, and suicidal ideation were more frequently observed in BP-II. BP-II patients exhibited a higher trend of lifetime co-occurrence of an axis I diagnosis (p = 0.09), and a significantly higher incidence of phobia and eating disorder. The overall occurrence rate of psychiatric illness in first-degree relatives was 15.4% in BP-I and 26.5% in BP-II (p = 0.01). Major depression (p = 0.005) and substance-related disorder (p = 0.051) were more prevalent in relatives of BP-II probands.

Conclusion

Distinctive characteristics of BP-II were identified in the current study and could be adopted to facilitate the differential diagnosis of BP-I and BP-II in ordinary clinical settings.